[ad_1]



A different week, one more VAR debate

The Video Assistant Referee technique has been heavily criticised in the Champions League once more following a number of troubles in the Barcelona vs Lyon clash.

There’s been significantly speak about VAR in current weeks.

The technique was 1st implemented at the Globe Cup in the summer time and basically received a lot of plaudits.

That lead to discussion as to exactly where else it could be implemented and the selection was taken to incorporate it in the Champions League this season from the knockout stages onwards.

Although, given that the knockouts, we’ve been speaking about VAR for all the incorrect causes.

GELSENKIRCHEN, GERMANY – FEBRUARY 20: The score board is noticed throughout the UEFA Champions League Round of 16 Initial Leg match in between FC Schalke 04 and Manchester City at Veltins-Arena on February 20, 2019 in Gelsenkirchen, Germany. (Photo by Stuart Franklin/Bongarts/Getty Photos)

Troubles persist week just after week

The 1st higher-profile difficulty came in the 1st leg of Manchester City vs Schalke.

Schalke had been awarded a penalty just after VAR adjudged Nicolas Otamendi to have handled in the location.

Although, an awful lot of folks on social media believed it was pretty harsh.

It was even revealed later on that the pitchside screens had been not even functioning throughout that clash so the referee couldn’t see the events himself.

An even much more controversial VAR selection came in the second leg in between Manchester United and Paris Saint-Germain.

Presnel Kimpembe was adjudged to have handballed in the location, handing Man United a 92nd-minute pen which knocked PSG out.

PSG had been not impressed in the slightest, Neymar even had to be restrained when confronting referees.

Now, there’s been much more debate more than VAR.

Barcelona – Lyon drama

Initial of all, VAR awarded Barcelona a penalty which divided opinion.

Jason Denayer went in for a tackle on Luis Suarez just before pulling out but Suarez stepped on his foot just before going down.

Just after a VAR evaluation, the penalty was provided, significantly to the surprise of a number of on social media.

It was even recommended on social media that there had been technical problems throughout the evaluation of the penalty.

There was additional criticism when Lyon scored to make it two-1.

VAR checked the objective, as they do with quite a few strikes, but their evaluation took exceptionally extended and the length of delay was heavily criticised.

Social media reacts to VAR overall performance




[ad_2]