The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, now marking its 70th birthday, has been credited with maintaining European peace given that the Second Globe War. But when Britain lastly leaves the EU, 80 per cent of its funding will come from outdoors the union. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, 66, the former Nato head and one particular-time PM of Denmark, mentioned escalating speak of an EU army is placing stress on Nato. But he mentioned that army couldn’t function without the need of Nato help.

Final week, German justice minister Katarina Barley, 50, known as for the force to be led by the EU parliament, though EU federalist Guy Verhofstadt, 65, marked Thursday’s anniversary by stating: “It is important we strengthen Nato by building its European pillar, primarily based on a European defence neighborhood and a European Army.”

Mr Rasmussen mentioned: “I welcome a strengthened European military co-operation if it indicates a genuine raise in defence investment and if it does not duplicate what Nato currently does.

“But we have to be clear. Right after Brexit, 80 per cent of all defence investment inside Nato will take location outdoors the EU. Any EU army will be a paper tiger.” It comes at an uncertain time for planet stability. On Thursday, Turkey, a Nato member, confirmed its controversial deal to obtain a Russian missile program.

On the exact same day, RAF Typhoons have been scrambled when Russian blackjack bombers flew close to British airspace to observe a substantial-scale military workout in Scotland.

Stock image of armed forces

The EU’s army plans have been blasted by a former Nato chief (Image: GETTY)

Mr Rasmussen mentioned rows more than spending – and the attitude of President Trump – have been causing issues. “Militarily, Nato is robust right now and members, which includes the US, have deployed a lot more troops to eastern states to strengthen our territorial defence.

“The primary purpose for this is not Donald Trump but Vladimir Putin. We had believed Russia were strategic partners. Now we know they’re strategic adversaries. That adjustments the complete equation.”

He mentioned Trump’s ambivalence more than Write-up five, the mutual protection clause that an attack on one particular is an attack on all, is a difficulty.

“When a US president publicly raises doubts more than Write-up five, he tempts Putin and other folks to test the revolve of Nato.”

Final month it emerged that Germany would not be escalating its defence spending, regardless of its pledge in 2014.

Meanwhile, it is persisting with the Nordstream two pipeline, which would raise its power reliance on Russia. Germany’s foreign ministry rejected claims that it is not totally committed to Nato but current US criticism has noticed relations sour.

“We’re acquiring a lot of doors a lot more challenging to open suitable now,” mentioned one particular US diplomat. “Things haven’t been as undesirable as this given that the Second Globe War.”

Britain accounts for a quarter of European defence spending by Nato’s 23 EU members and Mr Rasmussen mentioned: “Brexit can lead to a strengthening of Nato simply because it will crucial for the UK to demonstrate its commitment.”

At present Nato’s third largest challenge, following Russia and spending, is Turkey.

Ankara’s confirmation that the Russian missile “deal is done” brought a rebuke from US vice president Mike Pence, who mentioned: “Turkey have to pick – does it want to stay a important companion of the most prosperous military alliance in the history of the planet, or does it want to danger the safety of that partnership by creating reckless choices that undermine our alliance?”

But Mr Rasmussen rejected calls to kick it out. “Turning our back would basically let Turkey to strengthen its ties with Iran and Russia.”

The former Nato secretary general is also at odds with calls to limit its expansion.

Macedonia’s impending membership will raise the Nato club to 30 members. But hardline US critics are calling to reverse promises created in 2008 to include things like Ukraine and Georgia, on Russia’s doorstep.

Nevertheless, Mr Rasmussen mentioned: “Each nation has the suitable to choose their personal alliance affiliations – it can’t be the Kremlin which decides the destiny of Georgia and the Ukraine.”

In a message to Mr Putin, he added: “Russia must contemplate why all its neighbours are so eager to join Nato to get the protection they really feel they will need.

“Putin has ­created a hostile atmosphere.

“In this sense, Nato couldn’t be healthier. Nations think in the alliance and want to join and Nato will maintain its door open.”