Issued on:

Insisting he wasn’t producing a threat, Pakistan’s leader denounced his Indian counterpart on Friday and warned that any war in between the nuclear rivals could “have consequences for the planet.”

India’s prime minister took the opposite method, skipping any mention at the United Nations of his government’s crackdown in the disputed area of Kashmir.

“When a nuclear-armed nation fights to the finish, it will have consequences far beyond the borders. It will have consequences for the planet,” Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan stated in a wide-ranging, at occasions apparently extemporaneous U.N. Basic Assembly speech in which he named Modi’s actions in Kashmir “stupid” and “cruel.”

“That is not a threat,” he stated of his war comments. “It is a fair be concerned. Exactly where are we headed?”

An hour earlier, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the U.N. meeting with a speech that focused mainly on his country’s improvement, even though he warned of the spreading specter of terrorism. He by no means described Kashmir straight.

India and Pakistan have fought two of their 3 wars more than the Himalayan area. They’ve been locked in a worsening standoff given that Aug. five, when Modi stripped restricted autonomy from the portion of Kashmir that India controls.

Modi’s Hindu nationalist government imposed a sweeping military curfew and reduce off residents in the Muslim-majority area from practically all communications. Khan stated there have been 900,00 Indian forces in the area policing eight million Kashmiris.

“What is he going to do when he lifts the curfew? Does he feel the persons of Kashmir are quietly going to accept the status quo?” Khan stated. “What is going to occur when the curfew is lifted will be a bloodbath.”

He added: “They will be out in the streets. And what will the soldiers do? They will shoot them. … Kashmiris will be additional radicalized.”

‘Message of peace’

Though not mentioning Kashmir by name, Modi touched on terrorism: “We belong to a nation that has offered the planet not war, but Buddha’s message of peace. And that is the explanation why our voice against terrorism, to alert the planet about this evil, rings with seriousness and outrage.”

Modi has defended the Kashmir modifications as freeing the territory from separatism. His supporters have welcomed the move.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi stated for the duration of his U.N. speech later Friday that “as a neighbor of each nations, China hopes to see the dispute correctly managed and stability restored to the partnership in between the two sides.”

The distinction in speech types in between the Indian and Pakistani leaders was striking, with Modi sticking closely to a ready text and Khan appearing to speak off the cuff and riff. Though the U.N. distributed a transcript of Modi’s speech moments following he completed speaking, Khan’s had not been released hours later.

Ahead of Modi’s and Khan’s appearances at the U.N., residents of Indian-controlled Kashmir expressed hope that their speeches would turn planet consideration to an unprecedented lockdown in the area.

“We truly hope these leaders will do some thing to rid us of conflict and suppression,” stated Nazir Ahmed, a schoolteacher on the outskirts of Srinagar, the major city in Indian-held Kashmir. “Conflict is like a cancer hitting each aspect of life. And Kashmiris have been living inside this cancer for decades now.”

As the two leaders spoke Friday, big dueling protests supporting and opposing India’s action in Kashmir have been taking location across the street from U.N. headquarters.

U.S. President Donald Trump, who met with each Modi and Khan this week, has urged the sides to resolve their variations.

India and Pakistan’s conflict more than Kashmir dates to the late 1940s, when they won independence from Britain. The area is one particular of the most heavily militarized in the planet, patrolled by soldiers and paramilitary police. Most Kashmiris resent the Indian troop presence.

Modi, a pro-business enterprise Hindu nationalist, and his celebration won a decisive re-election in May well. The election was noticed as a referendum on Modi, the son of a poor tea seller whose financial reforms have had mixed final results. But he has enjoyed enduring recognition as a social underdog in India’s hugely stratified society.

Critics, having said that, say his Hindu-initially platform dangers exacerbating social tensions in the nation of 1.three billion persons.