On January 26, 2018, the 68th anniversary of India becoming a republic, New Delhi hosted the leaders of all 10 member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) – from the Philippines’ Rodrigo Duterte to Indonesia’s Joko Widodo, Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi to Thailand’s Prayuth Chan-ocha. For India, Republic Day has begun to assume a diplomatic significance, featuring a foreign head of state or government as the chief guest for the commemorative festivities. Current chief guests have reflected India’s foreign policy priorities: Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in 2014, U.S. President Barack Obama in 2015, and French President Francois Hollande in 2016. But the look in 2018 of not one particular but 10 leaders from Southeast Asia was a significant demonstration of the expanding significance that India accords its “Act East” Policy.

The Act East Policy remains the topic of considerable confusion each in India and overseas, for many motives. Very first, it is not a doctrine spelled out in an official Indian government document, such as a white paper, though its contours are clearly discernible, like in speeches by senior officials. Second, the Act East Policy represents the rebranding of an earlier Appear East Policy, which arose in the early 1990s. The variations amongst the two have not generally been produced clear. Third, the Act East Policy has usually been lost amid a quantity of associated, but distinct, strategic initiatives and ideas adopted not just by India but by other nations. There is distinct confusion more than India’s current adoption of the Indo-Pacific strategic idea, its partnership with the separate “free and open Indo-Pacific” techniques of Japan and the United States, and conflation with the quadrilateral safety dialogue (or “quad”) involving Australia, India, Japan, and the United States.

But in truth, the Act East Policy is rather particular about its ends, strategies, and signifies. India’s Act East Policy evolved naturally from the Appear East Policy as a direct consequence of the nature of China’s rise the inadequacies of the regional safety order in Asia and India’s personal expanding capabilities, profile, and obligations. By “Acting East,” India can play a meaningful function in managing China’s rise, incentivising its evolution into a additional transparent, marketplace-driven, status quo-oriented, and norm abiding energy. It can also aid to shape the regional order in a manner that is advantageous to Indian interests. Act East consequently represents the securitization of India’s eastward engagement, reflects a wider scope that encompasses the Indo-Pacific area, and heralds a higher urgency. It is meant to preserve a favorable balance of energy by guaranteeing a cost-free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific. The Act East Policy has antecedents, and India can construct upon its earlier history of leadership in Asia amongst 1947 and 1962.

Hunting ahead, India’s Act East Policy will involve at least 4 components. 1, India will have to safe the Indian Ocean area against higher safety competitors by way of far better maritime domain awareness, enhanced naval capabilities and presence, enhanced infrastructural and capacity improvement, and higher institutional leadership. This is at the core of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s slogan for the Indian Ocean, SAGAR (“security and development for all in the region”).four Two, India will have to accelerate its diplomatic, financial, and military integration with Southeast Asia in order to preserve a steady balance of energy in the area. This would complement attempts to preserve the institutional centrality of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), but will also need operating bilaterally with Southeast Asian nations on safety, trade, and connectivity. 3, India will have to deepen its strategic partnerships with other nations that share its issues about the manner of China’s rise, particularly the United States, Japan, and Australia, but also France, Russia, and other folks. Fourth, India will have to handle relations with China, mitigating variations whilst in search of avenues for engagement anytime feasible. Lastly, in addition to continuing with ongoing efforts, India will require to prioritise a quantity of new locations, like regional trade, naval acquisition, overseas project implementation, defense exports, air connectivity, and foreign investment screening. The following paper supplies an overview of historical antecedents for India’s reengagement with the area, outlines the driving things for India’s Act East Policy, describes the conceptual evolutions of Act East and the Indo-Pacific, specifics the 4 components of India’s Act East Policy to date, and, in conclusion, identifies priority locations for future Indian policy.